Scientific legacy: the silent transition of optics from Ibn Al-Haytham (Alhazen) to Newton

Main Article Content

Abstract

This article examines the deep and systematic intellectual connection between Ibn al-Haytham (965-1040) and Isaac Newton (1643-1727) in the development of the science of optics, considering how it was systematically obscured and developed in the history of science centered on the South. The study identifies the role of the methodology, concepts, and mathematical framework of Haytham's major work, Kitab al-Manazir, in preparing Newton's Opticks. However, this connection was hidden in my historical writing by studying a three-level process (distortion in translation, intellectual appropriation strategy forgetting, and downgrading in the historical canon). The main indicators of the study are that this is not an exclusionary effect, but the result of an ideological construct specifically oriented towards European culture, the so-called "orientation" of science, the so-called scientific achievement. Haytham, Greek and other traditions synthesized optics into a science, and thanks to Newton, this synthesis was reworked with the tools of the European modern era (resynthesis) and made possible its development. The main call of the article is to correct this historical distortion and recognize the truly universal, multicultural, and cooperative nature of science. To this end, it is recommended to reform educational curricula, develop transcultural teaching materials, and strengthen international scientific research. In the final word, science can only be universal when all its founders - regardless of their origin - are recognized and remembered.


Google Scholar


Article Details

How to Cite
Khalilov, Y., Aghamaliyeva, Y., & Mammedova, A. (2026). Scientific legacy: the silent transition of optics from Ibn Al-Haytham (Alhazen) to Newton. Scientific Collection «InterConf», (285), 146–162. Retrieved from https://archive.interconf.center/index.php/conference-proceeding/article/view/7945

References

Bernal, M. (1987). Black Athena: The Afroasiatic roots of classical civilization (C. I). Rutgers University Press.

Biagioli, M. (1998). Galileo, courtier: The practice of science in the culture of absolutism. University of Chicago Press.

Burke, P. (2016). What is the history of knowledge? Polity Press.

Dobbs, B. J. T. (1991). The Janus faces of genius: The role of alchemy in Newton's thought. Cambridge University Press.

Figala, K. (2007). Newton’s Alchemy. In I. B. Cohen & G. E. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton (s. 370–386). Cambridge University Press.

Guessoum, N. (2011). Islam's quantum question: Reconciling Muslim tradition and modern science. I.B. Tauris.

Hall, A. R. (1993). Isaac Newton: Adventurer in thought. Cambridge University Press.

Hanson, M. (2018). The visual world of Ibn al-Haytham: Optics, visuality, and the camera obscura. British Journal for the History of Science, 51(2), 171–198.

Harding, S. (1998). Is science multicultural? Postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies. Indiana University Press.

Harrison, J. (1978). The library of Isaac Newton. Cambridge University Press.

Hobson, J. M. (2004). The Eastern origins of Western civilisation. Cambridge University Press.

Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts (J. Anderson, Trans.). Polity Press.

Huff, T. E. (2011). Intellectual curiosity and the scientific revolution: A global perspective. Cambridge University Press.

Huff, T. E. (2017). The rise of early modern science: Islam, China, and the West (3-cü nəşr). Cambridge University Press.

Lindberg, D. C. (1976). Theories of vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler. University of Chicago Press.

Lindberg, D. C. (1996). Roger Bacon and the origins of Perspectiva in the Middle Ages. Oxford University Press.

Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press.

Newton, I. (1952). Opticks. Dover Publications. (Orijinal iş 1704-cü ildə nəşr olunub).

Priestley, J. (1772). The history and present state of discoveries relating to vision, light, and colours. J. Johnson.

Rashed, R. (2002). Les mathématiques infinitésimales du IXe au XIe siècle (C. 4). Al-Furqan Islamic Heritage Foundation.

Rashed, R. (2009). The development of Arabic mathematics: Between arithmetic and algebra. Springer.

Sabra, A. I. (1989). The optics of Ibn al-Haytham: Books I–III, on direct vision. Warburg Institute.

Sabra, A. I. (2007). The astronomical origin of Ibn al-Haytham’s concept of experiment. In J. Ragep & S. Ragep (Eds.), Tradition, transmission, transformation (s. 3–20). Brill.

Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.

Saliba, G. (2007). Islamic science and the making of the European Renaissance. MIT Press.

Shapiro, A. E. (2013). Newton’s optics: The spectrum, diffraction, and interference. In J. Z. Buchwald & R. Fox (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of physics (s. 127–152). Oxford University Press.

Smith, A. M. (2015). From sight to light: The passage from ancient to modern optics. University of Chicago Press.

Westfall, R. S. (1980). Never at rest: A biography of Isaac Newton. Cambridge University Press.

Whewell, W. (1857). History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present time (3-cü nəşr, C. 2). John W. Parker and Son