Implementing reflective feedback in undergraduate English language classes

Main Article Content

Anar Nurbolatova
Guldana Seidaliyeva

Abstract

Feedback plays a central role in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instruction; however, traditional feedback practices in undergraduate classrooms often remain teacher-centred and focused primarily on error correction. Such approaches may limit student engagement with feedback and reduce opportunities for reflective learning and self-regulation. In response to these limitations, this article presents a structured methodology for implementing reflective feedback in undergraduate English language classes. The study adopts focuses on the instructional design, pedagogical principles and classroom implementation of reflective feedback rather than on experimental measurement. The proposed methodology integrates feedback and reflection into regular teaching practices through a sequence of stages, including task completion, teacher-provided reflective feedback, guided student reflection and follow-up action planning. A range of practical tools, such as reflective journals, feedback sheets and self-assessment checklists, are used to scaffold reflective engagement. Observed instructional outcomes suggest that reflective feedback supports greater student engagement with feedback, enhanced reflective awareness and increased learner responsibility for learning processes. By systematising reflective feedback as a coherent classroom methodology, the article contributes to EFL pedagogy and offers a practical framework that can be adapted to diverse undergraduate teaching contexts.


Google Scholar


Article Details

How to Cite
Nurbolatova, A., & Seidaliyeva, G. (2026). Implementing reflective feedback in undergraduate English language classes. Scientific Collection «InterConf», (282), 106–115. Retrieved from https://archive.interconf.center/index.php/conference-proceeding/article/view/7869

References

Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462

Carless, D. (2016). Feedback as dialogue. Studies in Higher Education, 41(3), 395-407.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2019). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge University Press.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Moon, J. A. (2004). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. RoutledgeFalmer.

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462