The impact of Chat GPT on cognitive functions of university students
Article Sidebar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Main Article Content
Abstract
the article explores issues related to the influence of ChatGPT on the cognitive abilities of students. The purpose of this work is to study the pedagogical possibilities of using neural networks using the example of ChatGPT for the development of cognitive activity. ChatGPT is a tool that initiates a rethinking of the education system, contributing to the formation of the educational process of the future with the need to change technologies, methods, approaches and means of teaching. Understanding how ChatGPT works will allow educators to identify limitations in using this chatbot and artificial intelligence technologies in the educational process. Whatever the attitude towards artificial intelligence technologies, it should be recognized that they will soon become an integral part of the educational process, which means that every higher education teacher needs to learn how to use them effectively. In order for GPT chat to truly develop neuroplasticity and cognitive abilities, a sufficient level of education and IQ is required. Emotional IQ (EQ) is necessary to understand nuances, the effectiveness of formulations, and stimulate the imagination. A basic level of education is required to master any instrument. There's no way it can replace basic academic skills, emotional, rational, creative and critical thinking.
Article Details
References
Terwiesch C. Would ChatGPT Get a Wharton MBA? A Prediction Based on Its Performance in the Operations Management Course / Mack Institute for Innovation Management at the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 2023. https://mackinstitute.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/ Christian-Terwiesch-Chat-GTP-1.24.pdf
Thorp H. ChatGPT is fun, but not an author // Science. 2023. Vol. 379. № 6630. P. 313-314. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879
Dis van E. A.M., Bollen J., Rooij van R. et al. ChatGPT: five priorities for research // Nature. 2023. Vol. 614. P. 224-226. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7
Elkins К., Chun J. Can GPT-3 Pass a Writer's Turing Test? // Journal of Cultural Analytics. 2020. Vol. 5. № 2. P. 1-16. URL: https://culturalanalytics.org/article/17212-can-gpt-3-pass-a-writer-s-turing-test, https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.17212
Gao C.A., Howard F.M., Markov N.S. et al. Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers // bioRxiv, 2022. P. 1-18. URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.23.521610v1.full, https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.23.521610
Cotton D.R.E., Cotton P.A., Shipway J.R. Chatting and Cheating. Ensuring academic integrityin the era of ChatGPT // EdArXiv. 2023. P. 1-11. URL: https://edarxiv.org/mrz8h/, https ://doi. org/10.35542/osf. io/mrz8h
Nassim D. Plagiarism in the age of massive Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT-3) // Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics. 2021. Vol. 21. P. 17-23. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00195
Rosenblatt K. (NBC News). ChatGPT banned from New York City public schools' devices and networks. January 2023. Accessed: 22.01.2023. URL: https://nbcnews.to/3iTE0t6
Halaweh M. ChatGPT in education: Strategies for responsible // Contemporary Educational Technology. 2023. Vol. 15. № 2. P. 1-11. URL: https://www.cedtech.net/article/chatgpt-in-education-strategies-for-responsible-implementation-13036, https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13036