The impact of social technologies on industrial design: collective intelligence and integration approaches

Main Article Content

Naıla Huseynova

Abstract

This article explores the impact of social technologies on industrial design and the integration approaches shaped through the use of collective intelligence. While traditional industrial design primarily focuses on improving the aesthetic and functional features of a product, in the modern era, social networks, digital platforms, and user-centered approaches have become fundamental elements of the design process. Especially through the use of crowdsourcing and open platforms, designers gain access to a wide audience's opinions, which enhances their creative capabilities. The article emphasizes that social technologies influence every stage of product development, from the initial phases to the final implementation. The real-time application of online feedback and suggestions from users leads to products that are more efficient, functional, and appealing. Interactive design processes enabled by collective intelligence also facilitate the faster implementation of innovations. Furthermore, the analytical capabilities provided by digital platforms allow for a deeper understanding of customer needs, thereby ensuring the optimization of design. The article highlights how these approaches produce effective results in industrial design and underlines the importance of further developing such methods in the future.


Google Scholar

CrossRef

OUCI

Scilit

WorldCat

Index Copernicus

Semantic Scholar


Article Details

How to Cite
Huseynova, N. (2025). The impact of social technologies on industrial design: collective intelligence and integration approaches. Scientific Collection «InterConf+», (57(248), 633–640. https://doi.org/10.51582/interconf.19-20.05.2025.063
Author Biography

Naıla Huseynova, University of Economics

Design, Azerbaijan State

References

Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Creates New Alternatives for Business and Society. Harper Business.

Jeppesen, L. B., & Lakhani, K. R. (2010). Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Innovation Contests. Organization Science, 21(5), 1016-1033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0491

Brabham, D. C. (2013). Crowdsourcing. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9693.001.0001

Hekkala, R., & Taipale, S. (2015). Social Technologies and Their Role in Collaborative Design. International Journal of Information Management, 35(4), 446-456.

Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2333.001.0001

Buur, J., & Matthews, B. (2008). Participatory Innovation: A Methodology for the Involvement of Users in the Development of New Products. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(11), 1-11.

Kelley, D., & Littman, J. (2001). The Art of Innovation: Lessons in Creativity from IDEO, America's Leading Design Firm. Currency.

Gaver, W. W., Dunne, T., & Pacenti, E. (1999). Design: Cultural Probes. Interactions, 6(1), 21-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/291224.291235

Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books.

Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M., & Jacobs, S. (2016). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Pearson.