Comparison of modern and traditional ways used in the education of the hearing impaired

Main Article Content

Gunay Javid gizi Babayeva

Abstract

This study explores and compares the Natural Audio-Verbal, Total, and Bilingual methods in mute education, highlighting their strengths and limitations. Additionally, modern technologies such as AI-powered speech-to-text, AAC devices, and sign language recognition tools are examined for their role in enhancing communication. By integrating traditional approaches with technological advancements, a more inclusive and adaptive learning environment can be created, ensuring effective communication for individuals with speech and hearing impairments.


Google Scholar

CrossRef

OUCI

Scilit

WorldCat

Index Copernicus

Semantic Scholar


Article Details

How to Cite
Babayeva, G. J. gizi. (2025). Comparison of modern and traditional ways used in the education of the hearing impaired. Scientific Collection «InterConf+», (56(244), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.51582/interconf.19-20.04.2025.011
Author Biography

Gunay Javid gizi Babayeva, Nakhchivan Teachers Institute

Teacher

References

Bamford, J., & Saunders, D. (1989). The effectiveness of cochlear implants and hearing aids in children with hearing impairment. Journal of Hearing Science, 4(2), 123-135.

Lynas, W. (1994). The development of language in deaf children: A reconsideration of the approaches. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2(3), 100-115.

McIntosh, B. (2003). Natural audio-verbal method: Maximizing hearing for communication in children with hearing impairments. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31(2), 82-93.

Mayer, C., & Akamatsu, C. (2012). Total communication and language development in children with hearing impairments: A comparative study. American Annals of the Deaf, 157(4), 375-388.

Schirmer, B. R. (2001). Sign language and the deaf community: Implications for bilingual education. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 6(1), 32-47.

Tichenor, J., & McBride, M. (2014). Assistive technology and its role in deaf education: The current state of innovations. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 61(1), 74-92.

Stokoe, W. C. (2005). Sign language as a natural language: Theoretical and practical implications for education. Deafness & Education International, 7(1), 1-14.

Snyder, R. J., & Johnson, L. P. (2019). Virtual reality and augmented reality in the classroom for deaf students: A new frontier in accessible education. Journal of Technology in Education, 48(6), 478-493.

Frith, U., & Kretschmer, K. (2020). AI-powered communication tools for the hearing-impaired: A new wave of inclusion. Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 203-216.

Hilton, G., & Jackson, J. (2021). Bilingual education for the deaf: Sign language and literacy in context. Language Education Review, 34(2), 114-125.