Main Article Content
The paper considers the problems with academic dishonesty at one higher educational institution that is located in East Kazakhstan. Despite the fact the Government has been fought for academic integrity since 2011 and a lot of measures have been taken to establish Academic Honesty, Kazakhstan's educational system is still experiencing plagiarism. The questions that the paper wants to answer are as follows: With what kind of academic dishonesty actions are students familiar with? What is the motive of plagiarism among students? Why is plagiarism still relevant in the current academic context? How should higher education institutions address the issue of academic dishonesty? The method employed in this paper is qualitative research. 10 students( 1 -first-year student, 6 – third-year students, 3 – fourth-year students) from different departments were interviewed.This research reveals some crucial outcomes referring to the knowledge of students, reasons of plagiarism and recommendations of participants to address the current situation in higher educational institutions. According to the findings, despite the fact that there are several types of actions against Academic integrity, the vast majority of students are aware of only plagiarism as the main academic dishonesty action. One of the significant motives of students’ plagiarism is the negligence of educators in terms of verification for reference in students’ papers. Another predominant figure from these findings is that the lack of knowledge in citation plays a significant role as the main reason of academic dishonesty among students. This issue is still relevant in current academic context due to the several factors, such as students’ biased opinion related to the program anti – plagiat, the equal level of plagiarism from students and teachers. To sum up, this research paper concerns the significant problem of Kazakhstani universities, its relevance and its potential solutions.
Exemplary Academic Integrity Project (EAIP): Embedding and extending exemplary academic integrity policy and support frameworks across the higher education sector (2013), Plain
English definition of Academic Integrity, Office for Learning and Teaching Strategic
Commissioned Project 2012-2013, http: www.unisa.edu.au/EAIP.
Utupin, D. (2017, April 11). Towards academic honesty and transparency. Zakon.kz. https://www.zakon.kz/4853112-k-akademicheskojj-chestnosti-i.html
Shimirbaeva, G. (2014). Science unfer plagiarism. Oneline.zakon.kz. https://www.google.com/amp/s/online.zakon.kz/Document/%3fdoc_id=31579959
Oljaev, A. ( 2014, June 27). In Kazakhstan every tenth scientific work is plagiarism. 365info.kz. https://365info.kz/2014/06/plagiatom-yavlyaetsya-kazhdaya-desyataya-nauch naya-rabota-v-rk
Plagiarism was found in 80 per cent of the participants in the national scientific competition for law students. (2020, June 1). informburo.kz. https://informburo.kz/novosti/v-rabotah-80-uchastnikov-respublikanskogo-nauchnogo-konkursa-sredi-studentov-pravovedov-vyyavili-plagiat-107084.html
Chekhovich, V.U. (2019, October 11). Antiplagiarist found plagiarism in Jacpova’s dissertation!. Antiplagiat.ru. https://www.antiplagiat.ru/news/Zhakypova-dissertation-scandal-111019
Kokkinaki, A. I., Demoliou, C., & Iakovidou, M. (2015). Students’ perceptions of plagiarism and relevant policies in Cyprus. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 11(1), 1-11.
Eret, E., & Gokmenoglu, T. (2010). Plagiarism in higher education: A case study with prospective academicians. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3303-3307.
Artiukhov, A. Y., & Liuta, O. V. (2017). Academic integrity in Ukrainian higher education: values, skills, actions.
Harji, M. B., Ismail, Z., Chetty, T. N., & Letchumanan, K. (2017). Technical and Non-Technical Programme Students' Attitudes and Reasons for Plagiarism. English Language Teaching, 10(11), 141-155.
Naghdipour, B., & Emeagwali, O. L. (2013). Students’ justifications for academic dishonesty: Call for action. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 261-265.
Cheema, Z. A., Mahmood, S. T., Mahmood, A., & Shah, M. A. (2011). Conceptual awareness of research scholars about plagiarism at higher education level: Intellectual property right and patent. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(1).
EGAÑA, Txema (2012). “Use of Bibliography and Academic Plagiarism among University Students”. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal (RUSC), 9(2), 200-212.
Olafson, L., Schraw, G., Nadelson, L., Nadelson, S., Kehrwald, N. (2013). Exploring the judgment–action gap: College students and academic dishonesty. Ethics & Behavior, 23(2), 148-162.
Šprajc, P., Urh, M., Jerebic, J., Trivan, D., & Jereb, E. (2017). Reasons for plagiarism in higher education. Organizacija, 50(1), 33-45.
Jereb, E., Perc, M., Lämmlein, B., Jerebic, J., Urh, M., Podbregar, I., & Šprajc, P. (2018). Factors influencing plagiarism in higher education: A comparison of German and Slovene students. PloS one, 13(8), e0202252.
Comas-Forgas, R., Sureda-Negre, J. (2010). Academic plagiarism: Explanatory factors from students’ perspective. Journal of Academic Ethics, 8(3), 217-232.
Sarsenbayeva, A. (2020). The Effect of Academic Integrity Policy on Students’ Perception of Academic Dishonesty: A Case of One Kazakhstani University (Doctoral dissertation, Nazarbayev University Graduate School of Education).
Young, J., McGrath, R., & Filiault, S. (2009). Linda Dale Bloomberg & Marie F. Volpe (2008). Completing Your Qualitative Dissertation: A Roadmap From Beginning to End. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research (Vol. 10, No. 3).
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis.