Definition of "Frame" in the Humanities and the Architectural and Construction Industry: Commonalities and Differences

Main Article Content

Liudmyla Bachynska
Vasil Bachynskii

Abstract

The concept of a frame as a way of defining the main component, the main element that creates space, organizes it using certain patterns and assumes responsibility for its organization, is important for understanding the systematicity of the person himself, his actions in creating the world around him. The orderliness of the frame provides a certain order in the organization of the structure of space and the hierarchy of the construction of the whole. The frame exists as “reference points” of the construction of the whole and the connections between them, which ensure the communicativeness and integrity of the structure. The article considers the definition of “frame” in the humanities – philosophy, political science, sociology, economics, financial affairs, law, pedagogy – and in the art, architecture and construction industries. Proposals are made for the definition of the frame in the architectural and construction industry and its further improvement in accordance with the changes in people's needs in architectural and spatial organization in the future. The purpose of the study is to determine the essence of the frame, the need for its application in the humanitarian disciplines and to clarify the directions of its further use in the architectural and construction industry and art. The wide range of application of the definition of "frame" contributes to understanding the integrity of approaches to the study of various areas of knowledge, which is of particular importance for teaching disciplines for theoretical and practical training of students.


Google Scholar

CrossRef

OUCI

Scilit

WorldCat

Index Copernicus

Semantic Scholar


Article Details

How to Cite
Bachynska, L., & Bachynskii, V. (2026). Definition of "Frame" in the Humanities and the Architectural and Construction Industry: Commonalities and Differences. Scientific Collection «InterConf+», (72(306), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.51582/interconf.19-20.08.2026.017
Author Biographies

Liudmyla Bachynska, the Department of Fundamentals of Architecture and Architectural Design; Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture

Candidate of Architecture, Associate Professor, Professor of

Vasil Bachynskii, PROEXSP Limited Liability Company

Lead Technical Documentation Expert

References

Timokhin V.O., Shebek N.M. 2025. Suziria arkhitekturno-mistobudivnoi spadshchyny Ukrainy: Monohrafiia. Kyiv: TOV «NVP «Interservis», 2025. 272 s. (in Ukrainian)

Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy (z dot. i dopov.) 2005. Uklad. i holov. R V.T. Busel. – K.: Irpin, VTF «Perun», 2005. – 1728 s. ISBN 966-569-013-2. Karkas S. 525. (in Ukrainian)

Artbolevskij I.I. 1977. Politehnicheskij slovar. – Moskva: Sovetskaya Enciklopediya, 1977. – S.200. (in Russian)

Gusev S.S. Konceptualnij karkas. Enciklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki./ https://philosophy.niv.ru/doc/encyclopedia/epistemology/articles/54 9/konceptualnyj-karkas.htm. (in Russian)

Gusev S.S., Goldberg F.N. 2026. Konceptualnyj karkas Gumanitarnyj portal: koncepty [Elektronnyj resurs]. Centr gumanitarnyh tehnologij, 2002–2026 (poslednyaya redakciya: 25.02.2026). URL: https://gtmarket.ru/concepts/7133 . (in Russian)

Iovchuk M.T. i dr. 1975. Kratkij ocherk istorii filosofii. Izd. 3, -Moskva: Mysl, 1975. (in Russian)

Vilchynskyi Yu. 2009. Filosofiia istorii: teoriia vzaiemopronyknennia chasu i vichnosti. – Kyiv: Polihrafknyha, 2009. (in Ukrainian)

Horskyi V.S. 2001. Istoriia ukrainskoi filosofii (Navchalnyi posibnyk). – Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 2001 (in Ukrainian)

Rudenko, Mykola. 2001. Hnosys i suchasnist: (arkhitektura Vsesvitu) / Mykola Rudenko . - Ternopil : Dzhura, 2001 . - 247 s. (in Ukrainian)

Popper Karel. 2017. 10 naitsikavishykh kontseptsii filosofa Karla Poppera https://gazeta.ua/ piatnytsia, 28 lypnia 2017 r. https://gazeta.ua/articles/edu-and-science/_10-najcikavishih-koncepcij-filosofa-karla-poppera/785194#goog_rewarded (in Ukrainian)

Kun T. 2023. Enciklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki. «Konceptualnyj karkas». Internet 17.02.23. (in Russian)

Prosina O.V. 2023. Reformuvannia osvity: profesiina transformatsiia pedahohichnykh pratsivnykiv u konteksti viiny na povoiennoho periodu. / «Universytet menedzhmentu osvity», Ukraina. https://orcid.org/0000‐ 0002‐1243‐6069 prosina.olga.v@uem.edu.ua / Visnyk pisliadyplomnoi osvity. Vypusk 26(55) Seriia «Pedahohichni nauky» (Katehoriia «B») Bulletin of Postgraduate education. Issue 26(55) Educational Sciences Series (Category «B») S.199-214. https://doi.org/10.58442/2218‐7650‐ 2023‐26(55) (in Ukrainian)

Hnatiuk Ya. 2024. Filosofska i metafilosofska lohika / Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Seriia filos.-politoloh. studii. 2024. Vypusk 52, c. 77-90. Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Philos. -Political Studies. Issue 52, p. 77-90. UDK 16:1]122 / 129 DOI https://doi.org/10.30970/PPS.2024.52.9 (in Ukrainian)

Kapitonova Yu.V., Letichevskij A.A. 2003. Paradigmy i idei akademika V.M. Glushkova. – Kiev: Naukova dumka, 2003. . (in Russian)

Chornomordenko I.V. 2005. Problema isnuvannia znannia za mezhamy nauky: Monohrafiia. – Kyiv: KNUBA, 2005. (in Ukrainian)

Horodianenko V.H. 1999. Sotsiolohiia. – Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo «Akademiia», (in Ukrainian)

Onopriienko V. 2008. Retsenziia na monohrafiiu «Etos nauky v epokhu zmin» Эtos nauky / Pod redaktsyei L.P. Kyiashchenko, E.Z. Myrskoi. – M.: Academia, 2008. – 544 s. - Visnyk NAN Ukrainy, 2009, № 6. - S.58-62. ISSN 0372-6436. (in Ukrainian)

Pashyna N. 2012. Kontsept politychnoi identychnosti v ukrainskii politychnii nautsi / Politychnyi menedzhment, Vypusk – 4-5, 2012, S.180-190. (in Ukrainian)

Hunchak T. 2010. Rosiiskyi imperializm (aktualni svitovi dyskusii). Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim «Kyievo-Mohilianska akademiia», 2010. (in Ukrainian)

Volovyk O.A. 2014. Pohliad na pravo i rozvytok ekonomiko-pravovoho dyskursu: monohrafiia / O.A. Volovyk. — K.: Yurinkom Inter, 2014 r. — 272 s. Rozdil 3.5. Kontseptualnyi karkas ekonomichnoi teorii prava S. 114. ISBN 978-966-667-597-5 https://jurkniga.ua/contents/poglyad-na-pravo-i-rozvitok-ekonomiko-pravovogo-diskursu.pdf (in Ukrainian) (in Ukrainian)

Lavrenko D.O., 2025. Struktura yurydychnoi konstruktsii yak formy orhanizatsii pravovoi informatsii / Elektronne naukove vydannia «Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo». Vypusk № 05, 2025, chastyna 1, S. 37-41. UDK 340.115:340.132 DOI https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2025.05.1.6 (in Ukrainian)

Shnipko O.S. 2023. Natsionalna konkurentno-spromozhnist: sutnist, problemy, mekhanizmy realizatsii. – Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 2023. (in Ukrainian)

Antkiv, Volodymyr. 2025. Adaptyvna model finansuvannia korporatyvnoho sektoru v umovakh fazovoi asymetrii ekonomichnoho tsyklu / Economic Analysis. 2025. Vol. 35. No. 4. pp. 364–373. DOI: (in Ukrainian) https://doi.org/10.35774/econa2025.04.364

Grushka Emanuel. 1963. Razvitie gradostroitelstva. – Bratislava: Izdatelstvo Slovackoj Akademii nauk, 1963. (in Russian)

Bachynska L.H. 2017. Evoliutsiia arkhitektury i mistobuduvannia Ukrainy z kintsia KhIKh do pochatku KhKhI stolit: prychyny ta tendentsii. International Scientific and Practical Conference “WORLD SCIENCE”. № 10 (26), Vol. 1, October 2017. Proceedings of the IY International Scientific and Practical Conference “Topical Problems of Modern Science and Possible Solutions”. September 30, 2017, Dubai, UAE. - pp. 43-48. (in Ukrainian)

Bachynska L.H. 2017. Arkhitektura ta mistobuduvannia Ukrainy u perekhidni periody ekonomichno-politychnoho stanu KhKh stolittia. / WORLD SCIENCE. № 11 (27), Vol. 1, November 2017. MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC EDITION. RS Global Sp. Z O.O., Warsaw, Poland, 2017. -рp. 40-46. (in Ukrainian)

Bachynska L.H. 2015. Arkhitekturno-mistobudivna spadshchyna Ukrainy yak vidbyttia sotsialnoi istorii KhKh-pochatku KhKhI stolit. / Rehionalna polityka: istoriia, polityko-pravovi zasady, arkhitektura, urbanistyka [zb. nauk. pr.] – Kyiv-Ternopil: - 2015. -Vyp. III. Materialy Tretoi Mizhnar.nauk.-prakt.konf. (Kyiv, 22-23 lystopada 2017 r.)/Min-vo osvity i nauky Ukrainy, Kyiv. nats. un-t budivn. i arkhit-ry ta in. – “Beskydy” – 2017. – V 3-kh ch. – Ch.2. – 307 s. – S. 40-45. (in Ukrainian)

Bachynska L.H. 2017. Vplyv suspilnykh protsesiv na formuvannia komunikatsii arkhitekturnoho obiekta yak holovnoi skladovoi yoho struktury. / Suchasni tendentsii rozvytku arkhitektury i mistobuduvannia: materialy vseukr.nauk.-tekhn.konf. Kharkiv, lystopad 2017 r. – Kharkiv: KhNUMH im.. O.M.Beketova, 2018. – 290 s. - S.11-12.

Bachynska Liudmyla. 2018. Architectural-spatial formatting as a reflection of social and political needs - Proceedings of the Third International Conference of European Academy of Science. - Deсember 20-30, 2018, Bonn, Germany. - pp. 93-94.