REGIONAL ECONOMY ECOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC SUBSTANTIATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES IN UKRAINE

. The article reveals the approaches to the implementation of ecological and economic justification of the development of territorial communities. It was found out that the formation of territorial communities in Ukraine involves the creation of innovative facilities that are mixed and characterized by a combination of economic and man-made and natural objects, which leads to a new spatial basis for studying current environmental and economic issues and identifying priorities. It is established that the assessment of spatial aspects in the analysis of environmental and economic factors of territorial communities consists of the following analytical components: identifying the prevalence of environmental and economic trends in the community, as well as the consumption of certain resources per unit area (productivity per unit area). It was found out that the development of the territorial community should include a balanced combination of financial and economic, cultural, social and natural and environmental objectives: agriculture, forestry, fisheries, etc.), in combination with the development of green tourism and ecological infrastructure, as well as improving the quality characteristics of ecosystem services.


INTRODUCTION
Ecological and economic substantiation of decisions on the development of newly formed territorial communities in Ukraine on topical issues requires scientific research in both theoretical and practical aspects. In solving the problems of formation of a certain territorial community as a structure of local self-government, the ecological and economic capacity of the region is important, as well as the "response" of the ecosystem of this territory to anthropogenic impacts.
When assessing the ecological and economic indicators of a particular territorial community, the mechanism of ecological expertise is used. This mechanism provides for a preliminary check of compliance of socio-economic activities with environmental requirements in order to prevent the harmful effects of these activities on the environment and health of residents of local communities.
Given the above definition of environmental and economic priorities and the formation of policies to address relevant issues should be included in the development strategy of each local community, as well as (preferably) in a separate environmental action plan.

MATERIAL SANDMETHODS
The study takes into account the Concept of reforming local self-government and territorial organization of state power in Ukraine (2014) [13], which provides a set of measures within decentralization to create appropriate financial, material and organizational conditions to ensure the implementation of local governments and their own delegated powers [9, p. 22]. This list is usually not a dogma and can be expanded in view of the number of components and indicators [15].
Summarizing this and other definitions, socio-ecological and economic development of united territorial communities can be considered as a process of harmonious growth of socio-economic, demographic, cultural and environmental spheres, in which the use of natural resources should be optimized and anthropogenic impact -minimized. Of course, this reduction of the burden on nature must be accompanied by the formation of an innovative structure of the UTC's (united territorial community) economy and the creation of appropriate conditions for the development of small and medium-sized businesses.
It is interesting to note that today the new government management is applied in many countries around the world and is mainly associated with the industrialized countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), including the United States. In this context, citizens are seen as "clients" and civil servants as managers. There is also a parallel coordination of relations between the heads of public services and their political leaders; there is a system of incentives based on incentives for public sector managers, such as remuneration, and clear benchmarks are often set, which are assessed through performance appraisal systems; there is relatively more discretion and freedom for public sector leaders in how they achieve their goals; Finally, this model contrasts significantly with the The following types of territorial zoning are distinguished, taking into account the natural factor: natural and economic zoning (basic criterion -natural resource potential); ecological zoning (criterion -an indicator of environmental pollution); ecological and economic zoning (criterion -the level of impact that is correlated with the potential for environmental sustainability) [1, 2, etc.].
At present, the basis of ecological and economic zoning should be the consideration of territorial heterogeneity of relations in the system "impactenvironment -consequences". If purely ecological zoning is characterized by a larger average and large scale of research, then for ecological and economic zoning a relatively smaller scale should be taken as a basis. In recent decades, these issues have found their normative and legal consolidation at the supranational level, in particular in such international documents as "Agenda for the XXI century." (1992) [9] and "Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development" (2015) [13]).
In particular, in the "Agenda for the XXI century" adopted in 1992, it was suggested that governments and international organizations together with the nongovernmental sector "develop criteria and methodology for assessing the resource intensity and environmental impact of products and processes throughout their life cycle" [12, paragraph 4.20]. The Procedure also emphasized that the results of such assessments should be presented in the form of clear and understandable indicators that allow to adequately inform both consumers and decision-makers [11]. At the same time, the document emphasizes the need to "take into account the value systems specific to each country and the possibility of applying the standards that apply in most developed countries" [9, paragraph 6.39]. At the same time, it is emphasized that it is expedient to do so "without prejudice to such criteria as may be agreed by the international community or for standards that will need to be set at the national level" [11].
In 2015, a document entitled "Transforming our world: An agenda for sustainable development until 2030" was adopted. [13] It states the need to use a set of generally accepted indicators that "will be developed by an inter-institutional expert group on indicators of achieving goals in the field of sustainable development ...". In addition, it was envisaged that "indicators will be complemented by indicators at the regional and national levels to be developed by Member States, as well as the results of the work done to determine baseline values for those tasks for which no results are available at the national and global levels" [12 , n. 83]. To stimulate the formation of united communities, norms on financial decentralization have been added to the legislation, which has allowed UTC to obtain additional resources for the implementation of delegated powers. In particular, UTCs received powers and resources that were previously provided exclusively to cities of regional significance, in particular -crediting to the local budget 60% of personal income tax. Also, territorial communities receive 100% of the single tax, corporate income tax and financial institutions of communal property and property tax (real estate, land, transport); 75% of the funds from compensation for losses of agricultural production; 50% of monetary penalties for damage caused by violations of environmental legislation through economic and other activities, as well as 25% of environmental tax. At the same time, UTCs received the right to state transfers for the exercise of powers: grants, educational and medical subventions, subventions for infrastructure development, etc.
The concept of economic damage from environmental violations allows us to translate the negative impact of projects within local communities on the environment from the category of environmental characteristics of the project in the category of its economic characteristics [2, p. 209]. It is important that the current procedure of ecological expertise is the only barrier to the implementation of environmentally hazardous projects in UTC. Therefore, when deciding on the feasibility of implementing an innovative regional project should take into account the economic damage from environmental violations caused by their implementation. In this case, not only environmental but also economic expertise will stimulate project developers to green production [5]. Thus, the transition to     This topic, undoubtedly, has significant prospects for further research, the most important of which is, in our opinion, the implementation of environmental and economic justification for the development of individual territorial communities in our country. Both urban and rural UTCs are of interest, as economic development is interlinked in both categories of communities. In particular, it would be productive to consider individual united communities of Kyiv region (both near and far from Kyiv -that is, for example, Bilohorodska / near / and Borodyanska / remote /) and a comparative analysis of strategies for their environmental and economic development. At the same time, the models of these strategies should be focused on a great approach, and the more urbanized the community, the more attention should be paid to the environment.